Microsoft Research
Conversational multi-agent simulations and orchestration from Microsoft Research.
GitHub Stars
58.1K
Contributors
533
npm / Week
—
PyPI / Month
1.5M
AutoGen is a Python framework for building multi-agent AI applications, originally released by Microsoft Research in 2023. It pioneered the conversational multi-agent pattern: agents that talk to each other in structured dialogues to solve tasks. The framework occupies the orchestration and agent runtime categories, competing directly with LangGraph, CrewAI, and Pydantic AI.
AutoGen’s design philosophy is research-first. The team behind it published multiple papers on multi-agent collaboration, and the framework reflects that academic rigor. The v0.4.0 rewrite (v0.4, late 2024) was a ground-up rearchitecture using an actor-based runtime, asynchronous messaging, and first-class support for streaming and cross-language agents. This addressed many of the architectural limitations of the original v0.2 codebase.
Popularity signals are strong: 58,114 GitHub stars, 533 contributors, and 1.5 million monthly PyPI downloads. However, as of early 2025, the project is in maintenance mode. Microsoft now recommends new users start with the Microsoft Agent Framework, and existing users are encouraged to migrate. That said, AutoGen remains a viable option for teams already invested in its ecosystem or those specifically researching multi-agent conversation patterns.
AutoGen v0.4 is built on three layers: Core, AgentChat, and AutoGen Studio.
The programming model is code-first but configurable. You instantiate agents with a model client (e.g.,OpenAIChatCompletionClient), attach tools, and then orchestrate via asyncio. A typical workflow:
1import asyncio2from autogen_agentchat.agents import AssistantAgent3from autogen_ext.models.openai import OpenAIChatCompletionClient45async def main():6 agent = AssistantAgent("assistant", OpenAIChatCompletionClient(model="gpt-4o"))7 # Run a single-turn conversation8 result = await agent.run("What is the capital of France?")9 print(result)
For multi-agent setups, you create multiple agents and register multiple agents, then useGroupChat to manage turn-taking and termination. The runtime handles message routing, streaming, and state.
Conversational Multi-Agent: AutoGen’s core differentiator. Agents converse with each other using natural language, with explicit termination conditions (e.g., max turns, token limit, consensus). This approach works well for tasks that benefit from dialogue: code review, research synthesis, debate, research synthesis.
Actor-Based Runtime (v0.4): Asynchronous, event-driven messaging. Supports streaming output from agents, cross-language agents (via gRPC), and distributed deployment. Built-in metric tracking and message tracing (OpenTelemetry) for debugging.
Tool Use: Agents can call external tools (APIs, code executors, databases). Tools are registered as callable components. The framework handles tool invocation and result injection into the conversation.
Human-in-the-Loop: Agents can request human input at any point. The runtime supports pausing and resuming conversations with human feedback.
Memory: Pluggable memory components allow agents to retain context across conversations. Supports both short-term (conversation history) and long-term (vector store) memory.
Tracing and Evaluations: v0.4 includes built-in tracing for agent interactions. Evaluation tools let you run automated tests against agent workflows (e.g., check that a code generation agent produces syntactically valid output).
AutoGen Studio: No-code UI for rapid prototyping. You can visually assemble agent teams, configure models, and run conversations. Useful for non-developers or for quick experiments before writing code.
Self-Hostable: The framework runs entirely on your infrastructure. No vendor lock-in beyond the LLM provider you choose.
Research Multi-Agent Patterns: Researchers use AutoGen to reproduce and extend the multi-agent setups from the original papers. Common experiments include role-playing agents (e.g., analyst, critic, summarizer) that collaborate on complex reasoning tasks.
Code Generation Pipelines: A team of agents — coder, tester, reviewer — iterates on a coding task until tests pass. The coder writes code, the tester runs unit tests, and the reviewer critiques style and correctness. This is a natural fit for AutoGen’s conversational loop.
Negotiation and Debate Simulations: Agents are assigned opposing positions (e.g., buyer vs seller, pro vs con) and converse until they converge on a consensus or escalate to a human. Used in economics research and policy analysis.
Customer Support Assistants: A triage agent routes inquiries, a knowledge-base agent retrieves answers, and a human-handoff agent escalates complex cases. The conversational model makes it easy to add or remove agents as business needs change.
Poor Fit For: High-throughput production pipelines that require deterministic, low-latency orchestration. AutoGen’s conversational loop adds overhead compared to a DAG-based framework like LangGraph. Also not ideal for single-agent RAG systems — Pydantic AI or LlamaIndex are more focused there.
Installation (Python 3.10+):
1pip install -U "autogen-agentchat" "autogen-ext[openai]"
For AutoGen Studio:
1pip install -U autogenstudio2autogenstudio ui --port 8080 --appdir ./myapp
Minimal Example (AgentChat):
1import asyncio2from autogen_agentchat.agents import AssistantAgent3from autogen_ext.models.openai import OpenAIChatCompletionClient45async def main():6 agent = AssistantAgent("assistant", OpenAIChatCompletionClient(model="gpt-4o"))7 result = await agent.run("Write a Python function to reverse a string.")8 print(result)910asyncio.run(main())
What You Need: An LLM provider API key (OpenAI, Azure, Anthropic, etc.). Optionally, a vector store for memory (e.g., Chroma) and an observability tool (OpenTelemetry collector).
Documentation and Community: Official docs at [microsoft.github.io/autogen/](https://microsoft.github.io/autogen/). Discord and GitHub for support. Note that most online tutorials still reference v0.2 — look for resources tagged with v0.4.
AutoGen vs LangGraph: LangGraph (by LangChain) is the current leader in production multi-agent orchestration. It offers a graph-based API with explicit state machines, better tooling for production (LangSmith for tracing, LangServe for deployment), and a broader ecosystem. LangGraph is a better choice if you need deterministic workflows, complex branching, or enterprise support. AutoGen is better if you want to experiment with conversational patterns, run research simulations, or prefer a simpler programming model without a graph abstraction.
AutoGen vs CrewAI: CrewAI focuses on role-based agent teams with a declarative YAML/JSON configuration. It is simpler to set up for common patterns (e.g., researcher + writer + reviewer) but less flexible for custom runtime behavior. AutoGen’s actor-based runtime gives you more control over message flow, streaming, and cross-language agents. CrewAI is a good entry point; AutoGen is better for deep customization and research.
When Not to Use AutoGen: If you are starting a new production project today, Microsoft’s own guidance is to use the Microsoft Agent Framework instead. AutoGen is in maintenance mode and will not receive new features. For teams already using AutoGen v0.2, the v0.4 migration is significant but worth it for the improved runtime. For everyone else, evaluate whether the conversational multi-agent needs carefully — LangGraph or MAF may serve you better long-term.
What the framework gives you out of the box, in plain language.
Agents converse with each other to solve tasks, with explicit termination conditions.
v0.4 runtime supports async messaging, streaming, and cross-language agents.
No-code UI to assemble and test agent teams visually.
The jobs this framework is best suited for.
Reproduce and extend the multi-agent setups from the AutoGen papers.
Coder + tester + reviewer agents that iterate on a coding task until tests pass.
Agents take opposing positions and converge on consensus or escalate.
Side-by-Side
Add a second or third framework and see stars, downloads, and capabilities lined up next to each other.
Close alternatives worth a look before you decide.
Stateful, graph-based agent workflows with first-class human-in-the-loop.
Complex, stateful agent graphs
Stars
32.3K
npm / wk
—
PyPI / mo
49.0M
Multi-agent crews with role-based prompts and explicit task hand-offs.
Role-based multi-agent crews
Stars
51.6K
npm / wk
—
PyPI / mo
9.6M