Haystack

Building an application is imperative (code-first) but declarative in structure: you instantiate components, add them to a pipeline, and wire them together. Control flow is explicit: you can create branching paths, conditional routing (e.g., skip retrieval if the query is short), and cycles for iterative refinement. Haystack 2.x supports loops, allowing agents to reflect on their outputs and re-enter earlier stages.

Multi-agent flows are modeled as pipelines that call sub-pipelines or include agent components with tool-use capabilities. Each agent component can host its own nested pipeline, enabling hierarchical orchestration. Human-in-the-loop is built into the pipeline graph: a special HumanValidation component intercepts tool calls and waits for approval, rejection, or parameter modification before proceeding.

Haystack is Python-only. There is no TypeScript SDK, which limits its use in full-stack Node.js environments.

Graph-based pipelines enable complex topologies beyond linear chains. You can model parallel retrievers (e.g., BM25 + dense embedding) followed by a reranker, then route results to different generators based on confidence scores. Conditional branches allow “if-else” logic inside the pipeline graph.

70+ modular integrations cover vector stores (Weaviate, Pinecone, Elasticsearch, Qdrant, Chroma), model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Hugging Face, Cohere, Google), document parsers (PDF, HTML, Markdown, slides), and tools (web search, code execution, calculators). Official integrations are maintained by deepset; community ones live in the haystack-community package.

Human-in-the-loop validation is not an afterthought. The ToolValidator component intercepts any agent tool call and presents it to a human for approval, rejection, or parameter editing before execution. This is essential for high-stakes automation (e.g., financial transactions, medical data handling).

Multi-agent coordination is supported through nested pipelines and the Agent component. Each agent can have its own set of tools and memory, and communicate with other agents via pipeline sockets. This is more structured than emergent agent-to-agent chat patterns: Haystack agents are deterministic and debuggable.

Streaming is supported at the generator level, enabling token-by-token output in chat applications. The pipeline propagates streaming responses through the graph.

Tracing and evaluations are first-class. Haystack emits OpenTelemetry-compatible spans for every pipeline run, which can be viewed in any observability backend (e.g., Grafana, Datadog). The evaluation module provides metrics for RAG pipelines (faithfulness, answer relevance, document recall) and can be integrated into CI/CD.

Memory is handled via ChatMessage stores and the ConversationalMemory component, which persists conversation history across pipeline runs.

Self-hostable and cloud-hosted: Haystack runs anywhere Python runs. deepset Cloud provides a managed platform with hosted inference, monitoring, and collaborative debugging.

Enterprise RAG over documents is the most mature use case. Teams build pipelines that ingest PDFs, slides, and tables, chunk them, embed them into a vector store, then run hybrid retrieval (keyword + semantic) with reranking. Haystack’s document processing pipeline (clean, split, embed, store) is production-proven at scale.

Semantic search and question answering power internal knowledge bases and customer support portals. The framework’s strong retrieval foundation (sparse/dense/multi-modal) delivers high precision for both fact lookup and open-ended QA.

Autonomous web research agents combine search APIs (SerpAPI, DuckDuckGo), content scraping, and self-evaluation. A pipeline fetches multiple search results, scrapes each page, extracts relevant sections, and uses a generator to synthesize an answer with citations. The agent can loop back to refine its search if the initial answer lacks confidence.

Customer support automation uses human-in-the-loop to validate tool calls (e.g., checking an order shipment status). The pipeline retrieves relevant knowledge base articles, generates a draft response, and passes it to a human for approval before sending.

Internal copilots for code generation, query writing, or data analysis: agents have access to databases, code interpreters, and documentation retrievers. The graph structure lets you add guardrails (e.g., validate SQL queries before execution) without breaking the flow.

Haystack is a poor fit for simple chat completions or linear chains where you just call one LLM. The overhead of building a pipeline for “prompt -> LLM -> output” is unnecessary; frameworks like Pydantic AI or simple openai SDK calls are lighter. It also struggles in JavaScript/Node.js ecosystems.

Install the framework:

You’ll need an LLM provider key (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) and, for retrieval pipelines, a running vector store (Weaviate, Pinecone, or in-memory for prototyping).

The smallest meaningful example: a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline.

Full documentation lives at [haystack.deepset.ai](https://haystack.deepset.ai). The community is active on Discord and GitHub. For enterprise features (role-based access, monitoring, deployment templates), see [deepset Cloud](https://deepset.ai/cloud).

Haystack vs LangChain: LangChain offers a broader ecosystem (JavaScript support, more integrations, larger community) and a lower initial learning curve via its chain abstraction. However, Haystack’s typed graph pipelines are more disciplined for production. If you need a quick prototype across multiple languages, LangChain is faster. If you need a reliable, debuggable pipeline for enterprise RAG with human-in-the-loop, Haystack wins.

Haystack vs LlamaIndex: LlamaIndex excels at document ingestion, indexing, and retrieval tuning. Its declarative index abstractions make it straightforward for standard RAG. Haystack’s graph pipelines give you more control over the orchestration logic (branching, loops, tool use). For complex agentic workflows that require conditional routing and iterative refinement, Haystack is the better choice. For simple “query a document” use cases, LlamaIndex may be quicker.

Haystack vs CrewAI: CrewAI focuses on role-based multi-agent teams with natural language task descriptions. Haystack’s multi-agent model is more programmatic and explicit. Choose CrewAI if you want agents to “figure out” the plan via LLM reasoning. Choose Haystack if you need deterministic, auditable pipelines where every step is predefined and type-checked.

When to avoid Haystack: you need a TypeScript or JavaScript framework; your use case is a trivial chat completion; you want the most popular ecosystem regardless of architecture. In those cases, consider LangChain (TS), Mastra (TS), or plain OpenAI SDK.

• Higher learning curve for simple pipelines compared to linear-chain SDKs.
• Python-only — lacks a first-class TypeScript SDK.
• Migrating from older 1.x architectures to 2.x requires significant refactoring.

• Graph-based pipelines

  Connect components in a directed graph to build cyclical loops, conditional routing, and complex multi-agent flows.

• 70+ modular integrations

  Easily hook into vector databases, model providers, document parsers, and custom tools with official and community integrations.

• Human-in-the-loop validation

  Intercept agent tool calls to request human approval, rejection, or parameter modifications before execution.