Head to Head

NanoClaw vs OpenClaw

NanoClaw and OpenClaw compared on where they run, how your team reaches them, capabilities, live momentum and cost.

Tools for AI Builders—All the hardware and tools you need to run private AI at your office or at home.Shop Now

NNanoClaw

OOpenClaw

Profile

Runs

Self-Hosted

Self-Hosted, Desktop

Where You Talk to It

WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Teams, Email, CLI

WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Teams, Web, CLI, Desktop

License

MIT

Pricing

Free and open source (MIT). You pay for your Anthropic or other model usage.

Free and open source (MIT). You pay for the model provider and the hardware you run it on.

Maintained by

NanoCo

OpenClaw Foundation

Best for

Security-minded users who want an assistant they can fully read and audit

Technical teams that want a self-hosted assistant across every chat app

Live Data

GitHub Stars

–

Last Commit

—

Vendor Status

–

Price per 1M Tokens (In / Out)

–

Capabilities

Local Models

Cloud Models

MCP Support

Strengths

Agents run in isolated containers and only see the folders you mount.
A credential gateway injects API keys at request time, so agents never hold them.
Small codebase: one process and a handful of files you can review.
Runs on the official Claude Agent SDK, so it gets the latest Claude models and tools.

The largest community and skill ecosystem of any open source assistant.
Works in the chat apps your team already uses, from WhatsApp to Teams.
Model agnostic: use Claude, OpenAI models or local models and switch without rework.
Memory, credentials and state stay on your own hardware.
Run by an independent non-profit foundation, not a single vendor.

Trade-offs

Needs Docker and a terminal, so it is not for non-technical users.
No configuration files: changes mean editing code, usually with Claude Code.
Built around Claude first. Other providers are add-ons.

Researchers have found well over 100,000 instances exposed to the internet with unsafe settings.
Hundreds of malicious skills were found on ClawHub, its community marketplace, including password stealers.
Tools run directly on the host unless you configure sandboxing yourself.
A large codebase with many settings, so setup and hardening take real effort.

Which One Should You Pick?

NanoClaw

Pick NanoClaw if you need: Security-minded users who want an assistant they can fully read and audit

Full NanoClaw profile

OpenClaw

Pick OpenClaw if you need: Technical teams that want a self-hosted assistant across every chat app

Full OpenClaw profile

Back to All AI Agents

More AI Agent Comparisons

Monthly Report

The AI Build ReportSeptember 2026

Which models lead, where API prices moved, and what it costs to run them. Measured from live data.

Cover of The AI Build Report, the free monthly snapshot of AI models, prices and hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Straight answers to the questions we hear most often.

Can't find what you're looking for? Book a Discovery Call

What is the main difference between NanoClaw and OpenClaw?

NanoClaw runs as self-hosted. OpenClaw runs as self-hosted, desktop. That choice decides where your data lives, who maintains the agent and how fast you can roll it out.

Is NanoClaw or OpenClaw cheaper?

NanoClaw is open source and OpenClaw is open source. For both, the model bill usually matters more than the license. Use the agent cost calculator to estimate it for your workload.