LangGraph and Microsoft Agent Framework compared side by side on GitHub stars, downloads, language, license, capabilities, strengths and trade-offs.
TL;DR
Choose LangGraph if your stack runs on Python or TypeScript and you want an established, cloud-agnostic graph runtime with massive community adoption. Choose Microsoft Agent Framework if you build in .NET or Python and want deep integration with Azure AI Foundry alongside the combined legacies of AutoGen and Semantic Kernel.
Open framework for building agents and multi-agent workflows in Python and .NET.
Add a Framework
Slot 3 of 3
Comparing agent frameworks is the process of evaluating two or three competing libraries side by side on live community signals, technical capabilities, language, license, and trade-offs so a team can pick the one that fits its stack and roadmap.
Start with the constraints that are not negotiable: the language your team already ships in, the license your legal team will sign off on, and the deployment model you can support. A framework that fails any of those three is not really an option, no matter how popular it is.
Then look at live signals: GitHub stars and contributors show whether the project is gathering momentum, npm and PyPI downloads show whether teams are actually shipping with it, and last-commit date shows whether the maintainers are still around. Capability flags like multi-agent, streaming, tool use, human-in-the-loop, memory, and evaluations narrow the field to frameworks that match your job-to-be-done.
Finish by reading the strengths and trade-offs columns side by side. The smallest framework that covers your real requirements almost always beats the most popular one. Copy the share link once you have a comparison you trust so you can revisit it during planning.
Decisions about agent frameworks rarely happen in isolation. Pair this comparator with the directories and benchmarks that ground the rest of the stack.
Live data from GitHub and the package registries, refreshed every day.
GitHub stars
Contributors
Forks
Choosing between LangGraph and Microsoft Agent Framework comes down to language support, ecosystem maturity, and your target cloud infrastructure. LangGraph provides a battle-tested state machine engine with extensive multi-language JavaScript and Python support. Microsoft Agent Framework consolidates Microsoft's agentic AI tools into a unified SDK with rare first-class .NET parity, targeting enterprise teams deploying to Azure.
While both frameworks use graph abstractions to manage agent execution, their engineering priorities differ substantially:
Pick Microsoft Agent Framework if you need: Production agents in Python and .NET
Full Microsoft Agent Framework profileOpen and closed model rankings with benchmarks, context windows, modalities, and live API prices.
Straight answers to the questions we hear most often.
Can't find what you're looking for? Book a Discovery Call
Neither framework is universally better. LangGraph has greater ecosystem maturity, TypeScript support, and deeper community adoption. Microsoft Agent Framework is superior for .NET shops and organizations standardizing on Azure AI Foundry.
Yes. Microsoft Agent Framework is open source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted anywhere Python or .NET runs. However, enterprise guardrails and managed hosting capabilities are optimized specifically for Azure AI Foundry.
No. LangGraph is officially available only in Python and JavaScript/TypeScript. If your backend architecture requires a native C#/.NET agent SDK, Microsoft Agent Framework is the primary choice.
Microsoft Agent Framework is often easier for standard multi-agent patterns because it provides pre-built primitives for handoffs and group conversations. LangGraph requires learning low-level graph mechanics, state reducers, and edge routing before building complex applications.
Both frameworks support human review through checkpoints. LangGraph uses programmatic interrupts to pause a graph, allow state editing, and resume execution. Microsoft Agent Framework provides workflow checkpoints and built-in human-in-the-loop workflow stages.
Microsoft unified the architectures of both projects into Microsoft Agent Framework. The framework serves as the successor to both tools, offering formal migration paths for existing AutoGen and Semantic Kernel codebases.
LangGraph is more popular on GitHub with 39.7K stars, against 13.8K for Microsoft Agent Framework. Stars measure developer interest, so also compare downloads and contributors above.
LangGraph has 283 contributors and its last commit was 1 mo ago. Microsoft Agent Framework has 268 contributors and its last commit was 1 wk ago.
LangGraph was first released in 2024 and Microsoft Agent Framework in 2025. A longer track record usually means more examples, integrations and answered questions.
LangGraph has Evaluations built in. Microsoft Agent Framework does not, based on each project’s documentation. See the capabilities table above for the full list.
Microsoft Agent Framework has Type-Safe built in. LangGraph does not, based on each project’s documentation. See the capabilities table above for the full list.
LangGraph is a Python framework from LangChain Inc., released under the MIT license. Microsoft Agent Framework is a Mixed framework from Microsoft, released under the MIT license. The table above shows where their capabilities and community activity differ.
Start with the language your team already ships in. Then check which capabilities you need, such as multi-agent workflows, human approval steps or memory. Community size matters too: a larger project means more examples, integrations and answers when your team gets stuck.
PyPI downloads per month
| Feature | LangGraph | Microsoft Agent Framework |
|---|---|---|
| Maintainer | LangChain Inc. | Microsoft |
| First Released | January 8, 2024 | October 1, 2025 |
| Supported Languages | Python, TypeScript | Python, C#/.NET |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| GitHub Stars (at time of writing) | 39,709 | 13,824 |
| PyPI Monthly Downloads (at time of writing) | 43,651,931 | 166,265 |
| Type Safety | No | Yes |
| Managed Cloud Host | LangGraph Platform | Azure AI Foundry |
LangGraph models agent workflows strictly as directed graphs. You define nodes (which represent Python or TypeScript functions, agent logic, or tool executions) and edges (which represent conditional control flow or deterministic transitions). State is stored in a centralized, mutable state schema passed from node to node. When state changes, LangGraph writes an update through a reducer function, enabling full cyclical loops, branches, and arbitrary joins.
Microsoft Agent Framework unifies high-level conversational agent teams with structured workflow graphs. It formalizes common orchestration patterns into dedicated primitives: sequential runs, concurrent fan-out, direct handoffs, and group chat. Underneath these patterns sits a graph-based workflow engine with typed inputs and outputs. Developers working in C# receive idiomatic asynchronous task patterns and dependency injection, while Python developers get an API designed to match the same conceptual patterns.
LangGraph treats multi-agent orchestration as a graph wiring exercise. You construct supervisor agents, peer-to-peer handoffs, or hierarchical networks by routing edges based on agent outputs. Tool execution is modeled as standard graph nodes. For memory, LangGraph separates short-term working state (preserved in the graph's thread context) from long-term memory (persisted across independent threads via custom stores).
Microsoft Agent Framework includes built-in multi-agent primitives out of the box, building on the multi-agent conversational patterns popularized by AutoGen. It natively supports handoff workflows and group orchestrations without requiring you to manually wire complex conditional routing tables. Tool calling uses standard Model Context Protocol (MCP) conventions and function calling. Memory and conversational context are managed through built-in session state handlers and native middleware components.
Both frameworks prioritize durability, but they implement it differently.
LangGraph uses explicit checkpointers, such as MemorySaver for local testing and SQLite or PostgreSQL for production systems. Every step in the graph writes a state checkpoint to disk. This architecture makes human-in-the-loop workflows dependable: you can trigger an interrupt mid-execution, pause indefinitely, inspect the payload, edit state, and resume. You can also rewind graph execution back to any previous checkpoint to replay failed tool executions.
Microsoft Agent Framework provides workflow checkpoints, state persistence, and time-travel debugging capabilities. For observability, it relies on standard OpenTelemetry instrumentation across both Python and .NET, along with a dedicated local DevUI for inspecting runs. In production, its operational safety features (like prompt injection defenses, PII detection, and task-adherence checks) activate when deployed inside Azure AI Foundry.
At the time of writing, LangGraph holds a clear lead in community size and package downloads. With 39,709 GitHub stars, 283 contributors, and over 43 million monthly PyPI downloads, it is supported by a large ecosystem of community tutorials, enterprise integrations, and pre-built architectures.
Microsoft Agent Framework has 13,824 GitHub stars, 268 contributors, and 166,265 monthly PyPI downloads at the time of writing. While newer to market, it benefits from Microsoft's enterprise reach and the merged communities of AutoGen and Semantic Kernel. Its ecosystem is rapidly expanding, particularly among enterprise .NET engineering groups that were previously excluded from Python-first AI agent tooling.
Both projects are open source under the permissive MIT license, meaning both can be self-hosted in any environment without licensing fees.
For managed hosting, LangGraph offers LangGraph Platform, a purpose-built deployment layer providing managed task queues, state persistence, and operational APIs. It can be run on LangChain's managed cloud or deployed as a self-hosted instance inside your own VPC.
Microsoft Agent Framework is designed to integrate with Azure AI Foundry. It provides one-command deployment to Foundry Hosted Agents, giving teams managed infrastructure, enterprise security controls, and integration with Azure Functions for durable serverless execution. While you can self-host the open-source engine anywhere in Docker containers, teams running on AWS or Google Cloud must assemble their own deployment harnesses and security wrappers.
Choose LangGraph if:
Choose Microsoft Agent Framework if:
Migrating between the two engines requires rethinking how state and control flow are structured.
Moving from LangGraph to Microsoft Agent Framework is easiest when refactoring multi-agent networks. You can replace custom LangGraph router nodes with built-in primitives like handoffs and agent groups. However, you will need to map LangGraph checkpointer schemas to Microsoft's session and workflow persistence APIs. Teams migrating from AutoGen or Semantic Kernel will find official migration paths provided by Microsoft.
Moving from Microsoft Agent Framework to LangGraph requires expressing agent coordination as an explicit directed graph. You must convert high-level agent teams into individual graph nodes connected by conditional edges. While this shift adds initial boilerplate, it provides absolute control over how every state transition and retry executes in your application.