Kimi K2.5

Our Take

A solid 1000B-parameter MoE language model from Moonshot AI. Pulls ahead on competition math (AIME 2026) (96/100), so reach for it when that's the dimension that matters.

Generated from this model’s benchmarks and ranking signals. Editor reviews refine it over time.

• Total Parameters: 1000B
• Active Parameters: 32B
• Context Window: 256,000 tokens
• Vision Encoder: MoonViT (Native multimodal)
• Training Data: 15T tokens (Cutoff: April 2024)
• Input Modalities: Text, Image, Video

The 256k context length is a critical feature for local practitioners. It enables the ingestion of entire codebases or long-form technical documentation without the aggressive needle-in-a-haystack degradation seen in smaller models. Because it was continually pretrained from the Kimi-K2-Base, it retains high stability in instruction-following even at the edges of its context window.

Kimi K2.5 is positioned as a "reasoning" model first. It excels in tasks where logic and multi-step planning are required, particularly in Kimi K2.5 for coding and complex mathematical derivation.

• Multimodal Agentic Workflows: Using the Agent Swarm feature, K2.5 can decompose a single prompt into sub-tasks and execute them in parallel. This is ideal for local automation scripts where the model must call multiple functions to achieve a goal.
• Advanced Vision Tasks: The MoonViT encoder allows for high-fidelity image analysis and video understanding. Practitioners use this for automated UI testing, document parsing (OCR with layout retention), and security footage summarization.
• Technical Coding: It handles complex refactoring and architectural planning. Unlike smaller models that struggle with global state in a codebase, K2.5’s reasoning mode allows it to "think" through dependencies before outputting code.
• Multilingual Support: While developed by Moonshot AI, the model is highly proficient in English and several European and Asian languages, making it a viable local alternative for global applications.

The biggest hurdle for this model is the Kimi K2.5 VRAM requirements. Even with MoE efficiency, you must fit the 1000B parameters into memory. For local practitioners, this necessitates heavy quantization or multi-GPU setups.

To run 1000B model on consumer GPUs, you must use 4-bit quantization or lower.

• FP16 (Original): ~2,000 GB VRAM (Requires a massive H100/A100 cluster).
• Q4_K_M (Recommended): ~550-600 GB VRAM. This is the best quantization for Kimi K2.5 for maintaining intelligence while reducing the footprint.
• Q2_K: ~320-350 GB VRAM. Significant perplexity loss, but may fit on a 4x or 8x RTX 6000 Ada setup.

• The Mac Studio / Mac Pro Route: An M4 Max or M2 Ultra with 192GB of Unified Memory is the most cost-effective way to run K2.5, though you will likely need to drop to 2-bit or 3-bit quantization, which impacts reasoning benchmarks.
• The Multi-GPU PC Route: A professional workstation with 8x RTX 4090s (24GB each) provides 192GB of VRAM, which is still tight for a 1000B model. For full Q4 performance, you are looking at enterprise-grade hardware like the NVIDIA L40S or A100 80GB nodes.
• The Quick Start: Use Ollama or llama.cpp to run the GGUF versions. Ollama manages the memory offloading across multiple GPUs automatically, which is essential for a model of this scale.

On a high-end multi-GPU setup, expect Kimi K2.5 tokens per second to range between 5-15 t/s depending on the active expert utilization and your NVLink configuration. In "Thinking Mode," the perceived speed will be lower as the model generates internal reasoning tokens before providing the final answer.

When evaluating local AI model 1000B parameters 2025 options, Kimi K2.5 is often compared to DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.1 405B.

• Kimi K2.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3: Both use MoE architectures. DeepSeek-V3 is often cited for slightly better coding performance in pure Python tasks, but Kimi K2.5’s native multimodality (vision/video) and its integrated Agent Swarm make it a superior choice for builders creating autonomous agents that need to "see" their environment.
• Kimi K2.5 vs. Llama 3.1 405B: Llama 405B is a dense model, meaning it is significantly slower to run locally than K2.5’s MoE architecture. While Llama may have broader general knowledge, K2.5’s Kimi K2.5 reasoning benchmark scores in math and logic often edge out Llama in technical environments.

Kimi K2.5 is the current gold standard for practitioners who need a massive, multimodal "brain" for local deployment and have the hardware budget to support a 1000B parameter footprint. Its MoE design ensures that once the VRAM hurdle is cleared, the actual user experience is remarkably fluid.