Llama 4 Maverick

Our Take

A situational 400B-parameter MoE language model from Meta. Sits below the open-model average on our benchmarks; pick it for specific deployment constraints rather than peak quality.

Generated from this model’s benchmarks and ranking signals. Editor reviews refine it over time.

Key Specifications:

• Total Parameters: 400B
• Active Parameters: 17B
• Expert Configuration: 128 Experts
• Context Window: 1,000,000 tokens
• Modality: Native Text + Vision
• Training Cutoff: August 2024
• License: Llama 4 Community License

The 1M token context length is a critical feature for local RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) and long-document analysis. Unlike previous iterations, Maverick utilizes a natively multimodal architecture, meaning vision capabilities are not "bolted on" via a separate encoder but are integrated into the core transformer blocks. This leads to higher spatial reasoning accuracy when analyzing images or complex diagrams.

Llama 4 Maverick is tuned for high-agency tasks. Its Llama 4 Maverick reasoning benchmark results place it at the top of the open-weights class, particularly in multi-step problem solving and logic-heavy workflows.

Llama 4 Maverick for coding is a significant upgrade over the Llama 3 series. It handles complex repository-level refactoring and can ingest entire documentation sets into its 1M context window. It supports function-calling out of the box, allowing it to act as an agent that interacts with local compilers, debuggers, and terminal environments.

With native vision, Maverick can process architectural blueprints, financial charts, and handwritten notes. In a local environment, this is ideal for sensitive document processing where data privacy prevents the use of cloud APIs. It can extract structured JSON from complex forms or describe temporal changes across a sequence of images.

The model shows high ceiling performance in STEM subjects. Its ability to solve competitive-level math problems and follow complex, multi-lingual instructions makes it suitable for translating technical documentation across 30+ languages while maintaining technical accuracy.

To run Llama 4 Maverick locally, the primary bottleneck is VRAM capacity, not necessarily GPU compute cycles. Because only 17B parameters are active per token, the Llama 4 Maverick tokens per second (TPS) can be surprisingly high once the model is loaded into memory.

Because this is a 400B parameter model, you cannot run it on a single consumer GPU at high precision. You must look at multi-GPU setups or high-unified-memory workstations.

• FP16 (Full Precision): ~800GB VRAM (Requires enterprise hardware like 10x H100 or A100 80GB).
• Q4_K_M (4-bit Quantization): ~230GB - 250GB VRAM. This is the best quantization for Llama 4 Maverick for those seeking a balance between perplexity and footprint.
• Q2_K (2-bit Quantization): ~120GB - 140GB VRAM. This is the minimum entry point for "usable" reasoning.

For professional local setups, the M4 Max or M3 Ultra Mac Studio with 192GB of Unified Memory is the most efficient way to run this model. On the PC side, a 4x RTX 6000 Ada (48GB each) or a 7x RTX 4090 (24GB each) cluster is required to fit a 4-bit quantization.

If you are wondering how to run 400B model on consumer GPU hardware, the answer is usually "partial offloading" or "GGUF split across multiple cards." Using Ollama is the fastest way to get started, as it handles the layer splitting across multiple GPUs automatically.

On a Mac Studio (M2/M3/M4 Ultra), expect 5–12 tokens per second. On a multi-4090 setup using vLLM or llama.cpp, you can achieve 15+ tokens per second due to the MoE architecture's efficiency.

When evaluating Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek-V3 or Grok-1, the trade-offs center on the MoE implementation and the context window.

• Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek-V3: DeepSeek-V3 uses a Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) and a different MoE structure. While DeepSeek is highly efficient for coding, Llama 4 Maverick generally offers superior vision integration and a significantly larger context window (1M vs 128k).
• Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.1 405B: Maverick is significantly faster for inference thanks to the MoE architecture (17B active vs 405B dense). If you have the VRAM to store the weights, Maverick is the superior choice for almost every use case due to the speed-to-intelligence ratio.

Llama 4 Maverick is currently the top-tier choice for a local AI model 400B parameters 2025. It provides GPT-4 level intelligence with the privacy and persistence of local execution, provided you have the VRAM to house its 128 experts.