Turion Jev 31B is a decision model from Turion.AI, fine-tuned from google/gemma-4-31B-it. It reads a state plus typed questions (multiple choice, yes/no, 0-5 score) and returns a probability for every option from a single forward pass, without generating text. It handles up to 255 options per choice question and prompts up to 65,536 tokens. Weights are Apache-2.0 and it scores 66.16 on the Decision Index 0.3 public suite.
A workable 31.27B-parameter dense decision model from Turion.AI. Treat the modality benchmarks above as the leading indicator of fit — composite scoring across modalities is still maturing.
Generated from this model’s benchmarks and ranking signals. Editor reviews refine it over time.
Access model weights, configuration files, and documentation.
The top devices for this model at 4-bit, ranked by fit and speed.
| Device | Grade | VRAM |
|---|---|---|
| Acer Veriton GN100 AI MiniAcer | SS | 35.0 GB |
| AI TOP ATOM ATAGB10-9003Gigabyte | SS | 35.0 GB |
| AMD Instinct MI300XAMD | SS | 35.0 GB |
| AMD Instinct MI325XAMD | SS | 35.0 GB |
| AMD Instinct MI355XAMD | SS | 35.0 GB |
Cheapest current cloud rentals with at least 35 GB VRAM, refreshed hourly.
Advertising disclosure: we earn commissions when you shop through the links below.
| Option | Cost / GPU-hour |
|---|---|
NVIDIA L40Vast.ai · Spot · 48 GB VRAM | $0.27 |
NVIDIA RTX A6000RunPod · Community · 48 GB VRAM | $0.33 |
NVIDIA A100 80GB SXMVast.ai · Spot · 80 GB VRAM | $0.33 |
NVIDIA RTX A6000Vast.ai · Spot · 48 GB VRAM | $0.35 |
NVIDIA L40SVast.ai · Spot · 48 GB VRAM | $0.40 |
Per-GPU rate across RunPod, the Vast.ai marketplace, DigitalOcean, and Vultr.
Spot tier is interruptible. Plan for restarts when comparing against on-demand prices.
Turion Jev 31B is a 31.27B parameter dense decision model developed by Turion.AI, fine-tuned from Google's google/gemma-4-31B-it foundation. Instead of operating as a conventional conversational LLM, Turion Jev functions as a dedicated System 1 fast-judgment engine. It processes an input state alongside typed queries (multiple choice, yes/no, or 0 to 5 scalar ratings) and returns calibrated probability distributions across every possible outcome in a single forward pass. Because it eliminates text generation entirely, it sidesteps the latency overhead, token costs, and parsing failures inherent to traditional autoregressive inference.
Released under a permissive Apache-2.0 license, the model establishes a high-water mark for open-weights routing and classification. On the Decision Index 0.3 public evaluation suite, Turion Jev 31B scores 66.16, proving highly effective at deterministic classification across massive label sets. For practitioners seeking a local AI model with 31.27B parameters in 2026, it occupies a specialized niche: replacing multi-step prompt engineering and fragile JSON-constrained decoders with a single, high-throughput model designed specifically for agent decision loops and automated triage.
Turion Jev 31B retains the dense transformer backbone of Gemma 4, featuring 31.27 billion active parameters with standard causal self-attention. Rather than relying on a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) topology, its dense architecture guarantees consistent compute and memory access patterns across every query, regardless of input routing paths.
The model is configured with a 65,536-token context window. This large context capacity allows entire documents, long conversation histories, or extensive JSON state logs to precede the decision prompt without aggressive truncation. The execution pipeline utilizes several proprietary optimizations:
calibration.json (1.18 for multiple choice, 1.18 for yes/no, and 1.12 for scalar ratings).Because Turion Jev 31B generates zero output tokens, it excels in workflows that demand deterministic, structured decisions with quantifiable confidence scores:
To run Turion Jev 31B locally, hardware planning centers entirely on prefill processing and parameter footprint, rather than autoregressive decoding throughput.
Memory requirements depend on the precision level you deploy. When calculating capacity, ensure you account for the 65,536-token KV cache if you plan to feed large input states:
Understanding how to run a 31.27B model on consumer GPU setups comes down to target context length:
While many developers use Ollama as the quickest way to get started with generalist GGUF models, Turion Jev 31B uses a specialized inference pattern. Because it relies on reading log-probabilities across single-token option codes rather than generating a token sequence, standard autoregressive chat templates do not expose its full functionality.
The recommended deployment path is using the model's included turion_jev.kit_engine with vLLM as the backend, or launching its TypeSafe-compatible server via:
1python -m turion_jev.serve --model /path/to/turion-jev-31b --backend vllm --quantization fp8
For users deploying via quantized GGUF formats in standard runtimes, Q4_K_M remains the best quantization for Turion Jev 31B, maintaining high accuracy across calibration suites while minimizing memory pressure.
Traditional metrics like Turion Jev 31B tokens per second do not apply in the standard sense because the model generates exactly 0 output tokens. Measuring Turion Jev 31B performance requires evaluating prefill speed and single-pass request latency:
Because there is no decoding phase, you can process dozens of complex routing decisions per second on modest local hardware.
Practitioners often attempt routing tasks using general-purpose instruct models like Qwen 2.5 32B-Instruct through JSON schemas or instructor libraries.
The differences in production are stark:
Within the dedicated Decision Index leaderboard, Turion Jev 31B ranks among the top performers, tied at rank 2 on the Decision Index 0.4.1 suite (70.47) and scoring 66.16 on Decision Index 0.3.
/v1/systemone standard API, making it far simpler to integrate into existing production pipelines.
Explore the Provider
Aggregate stats, leaderboard, release timeline, and benchmark coverage across every Turion.AI model we track.

Check which of your devices can run this model and how fast.

Compare hosted per-token prices before you commit to local hardware.

Break-even math for self-hosting, renting a GPU, or paying per token.
Live status for the hosted APIs you might use instead of running this locally.