LFM2.5-24B-A2B is a text-only reasoning model from Liquid AI with 24B total parameters and 2.45B active parameters per token. It is a mixture of experts with 64 experts per block and top-4 routing, a 131K token context window, and support for 16 languages. Liquid AI post-trained it for tool calling and multi-step agent tasks, and the weights are open on Hugging Face. It is served on OpenRouter at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens.
A strong 24B-parameter MoE language model from Liquid AI. High composite score across our benchmark mix — worth shortlisting when raw quality matters more than VRAM budget. Newly released, so production-readiness is still being shaken out.
Generated from this model’s benchmarks and ranking signals. Editor reviews refine it over time.
Access model weights, configuration files, and documentation.
No benchmark data available for this model yet.
See how different quantization levels affect VRAM requirements and quality for this model.
| Format | VRAM Required | Quality | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2_K | 4.0 GB | Low | |
| Q4_K_MRecommended | 4.5 GB | Good | |
| Q5_K_M | 4.7 GB | Very Good | |
| Q6_K | 5.0 GB | Excellent | |
| Q8_0 | 5.6 GB | Near Perfect | |
| FP16 | 8.0 GB | Full |
The top devices for this model at 4-bit, ranked by fit and speed.
| Device | Grade | Speed | VRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GBAMD | SS | 51.6 tok/s | 4.5 GB |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060NVIDIA | SS | 48.8 tok/s | 4.5 GB |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GBNVIDIA | SS | 80.3 tok/s | 4.5 GB |
| AMD Radeon RX 7700 XTAMD | SS | 77.5 tok/s | 4.5 GB |
| Intel Arc B580Intel | SS | 81.8 tok/s | 4.5 GB |
Energy cost on Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB) (~6.1 tok/s, Q4_K_M) vs flagship API pricing.
| Source | Cost per 1M tokens |
|---|---|
Local (energy only)LFM2.5-24B-A2B on Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB) · ~6.1 tok/s · 12W | $0.066 |
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI · in $2.00 · out $10.00 | $4.40 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic · in $2.00 · out $10.00 | $4.40 |
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle · in $2.00 · out $10.00 | $4.40 |
Grok 4.5xAI · in $2.00 · out $6.00 | $3.20 |
API prices blended at 70% input / 30% output.
Hardware amortisation not included. Run the full ROI calculator for payback math.
Cheapest current cloud rentals with at least 4 GB VRAM, refreshed hourly.
Advertising disclosure: we earn commissions when you shop through the links below.
| Option | Cost / GPU-hour |
|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060Vast.ai · Spot · 12 GB VRAM | $0.05 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060Vast.ai · On-Demand · 12 GB VRAM | $0.07 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 TiVast.ai · Spot · 8 GB VRAM | $0.07 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060Vast.ai · Spot · 8 GB VRAM | $0.08 |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 TiVast.ai · Spot · 11 GB VRAM | $0.08 |
Per-GPU rate across RunPod, the Vast.ai marketplace, DigitalOcean, and Vultr.
Spot tier is interruptible. Plan for restarts when comparing against on-demand prices.
LFM2.5-24B-A2B from Liquid AI is an open-weight, text-only reasoning model designed for high-throughput autonomous agents and local tool execution. Built around an asymmetric Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, it packs 24 billion total parameters while activating just 2.45 billion parameters per token. This design gives engineers the deep contextual reasoning and broad factual retention of a mid-sized network at the operational latency and compute cost of a lightweight sub-3B model.
Unlike conventional dense models in the 20B to 35B parameter bracket, LFM2.5-24B-A2B enforces an explicit chain of thought before generating its final output. Liquid AI trained the foundation model across 36 trillion tokens and post-trained it directly inside agent harnesses to optimize tool routing, API handling, and recovery from runtime errors. As a local AI model with 24B parameters, it occupies an unusual and practical niche: strong reasoning and agentic benchmark performance paired with decode speeds that make real-time multi-step tool calls viable on personal hardware.
For developers seeking to run LFM2.5-24B-A2B locally, this release resolves the standard tradeoff between reasoning capability and generation speed. The model avoids the high latency of dense 30B+ architectures while outperforming bulkier models on complex orchestration benchmarks.
LFM2.5-24B-A2B departs from standard transformer designs by using a hybrid structural backbone across its 40 layers. Rather than relying solely on global attention, the architecture combines 30 double-gated short convolution blocks with 10 Grouped Query Attention (GQA) layers. The convolution layers handle efficient local sequence mixing with minimal memory overhead, while the interleaved GQA layers maintain global sequence coherence across extended contexts.
The MoE routing mechanism is structured around 64 fine-grained experts per block, with top-4 routing per token. Distributing computation across 64 smaller experts rather than 8 or 16 large ones gives the router granular control over token specialization. Because only 4 of the 64 experts fire for any given forward pass, the active parameter load remains fixed at 2.45B.
Understanding this split is critical for local deployment:
This design maximizes LFM2.5-24B-A2B MoE efficiency, delivering exceptionally high inference throughput on memory-bandwidth-constrained consumer chips.
The model context window extends to 131,072 tokens, backed by an expanded vocabulary of 128,000 tokens. This 131K window allows developers to feed entire multi-file codebases, comprehensive OpenAPI documentation, or sprawling conversational histories into the prompt without triggering truncation or requiring brittle RAG chunking strategies.
Liquid AI tuned this model specifically for autonomous execution, structured reasoning, and precise instruction following. Its key capabilities include:
Running this model locally requires understanding the difference between memory capacity requirements and compute throughput. While the model acts like a 2.5B parameter network during generation, you must load the complete 24B parameter set into memory.
The total memory footprint depends heavily on the chosen quantization format:
When considering how to run a 24B model on consumer GPU hardware, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and RTX 4090 (24GB VRAM) represent the best GPU for LFM2.5-24B-A2B setups. A single RTX 4090 running the Q4_K_M quantization can comfortably process prompts and sustain generation speeds between 80 and 120 tokens per second, thanks to the 2.45B active compute footprint.
On Apple Silicon, unified memory architectures provide an ideal environment for long-context runs. Systems equipped with 32GB, 48GB, or 64GB of unified memory (such as M3/M4 Pro and Max configurations) run the quantized GGUF or MLX checkpoints seamlessly. On high-end silicon like the Apple M5 Max, generation benchmarks reach up to 184 tokens per second.
The quickest way to get started is via Ollama or llama.cpp. Once the GGUF weights are registered in your local environment, you can run the model directly from the command line:
1ollama run lfm2.5:24b
For production agent harnesses using vLLM or SGLang on NVIDIA hardware, serve the native FP8 checkpoint to maximize batched throughput:
1vllm serve LiquidAI/LFM2.5-24B-A2B-FP8 --max-model-len 32768
Recommended sampling parameters across all runtimes are temperature: 0.1, top_k: 50, and repetition_penalty: 1.05.
Evaluating LFM2.5-24B-A2B against alternatives highlights the distinct tradeoffs between dense networks and sparse MoEs.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B features roughly 50% more total parameters and active parameters per token. While Qwen retains strong broad knowledge, LFM2.5-24B-A2B edges it out on dedicated agent benchmarks: scoring 48.09 versus 38.19 on LiveClaw, and 27.69 versus 8.72 on AutomationBench. Furthermore, the lower active parameter footprint of LFM2.5 translates directly to faster decode speeds and lower power consumption on local workstations.
Standard dense models in the 24B to 32B range activate every parameter for every token. On a single RTX 4090, a 4-bit dense 32B model typically generates between 30 and 45 tokens per second. LFM2.5-24B-A2B runs two to three times faster during generation phases.
The primary tradeoff lies in raw memorization. Dense 32B models have more total parameter capacity dedicated to general knowledge retrieval, whereas LFM2.5-24B-A2B prioritizes tool orchestration, structured reasoning paths, and low execution latency. If your workflow requires high-speed, multi-step autonomous tool use on a 24GB GPU, LFM2.5-24B-A2B is the more efficient architectural choice.

Explore the Provider
Aggregate stats, leaderboard, release timeline, and benchmark coverage across every Liquid AI model we track.

Check which of your devices can run this model and how fast.

Compare hosted per-token prices before you commit to local hardware.

Break-even math for self-hosting, renting a GPU, or paying per token.
Live status for the hosted APIs you might use instead of running this locally.